I went out to listen to Daniel Kahneman talk tonight. (If you don't know him he's a psychologist who won the Nobel Prize for Economics and is esentially, the father of behavioral economics. His book, Thinking Fast and Slow, is well worth a read). Most of his talk touched on the themes he's best known for and covers in his book: system 1 thinking (associative and intuituve) vs system 2 thinking (rational, considered and requires effort), framing, anchoring, loss aversion, etc. And all delivered in an easy to grasp, interesting and quite often humorous way. (He may also be one of the most genuinely humble people I've ever seen).
But one thing he talked about struck me as being quite interesting for advertising. Dr Kahneman ran a bunch of experiments to understand the relationship between experience and memory. People were asked to hold their hand in 14 degree C water for a minute. Cold enough to be verging on painful but not too cold to be difficult to do. They were then asked to repat this with their other hand. But at the end of the minute rather than being told to remove their hand some warmer water was added to increase the temperature by a degree or two. After another 30 seconds they were told to remove their hand.
The sample were then asked which experience they felt was more painful. 60 seconds of pain or 90 seconds of discomfort. Almost all chose the longer time period. Dr Kahneman explains this though the idea of the experiencing self and the remembering self. Our memories are not connected directly to experiences: their rough aproximations based on the average of the end of the experence and the most intense moment during the experience. The duration of the experience, for example, seems to have little to do with how we remember something.
At the moment as an industry we have become more and more obsessed with designing for the experiencing self: how can we make the bsst experience possible. We talk about brands as experiences, experience design, etc. We tend to increasingly downplay advertising and scrabble to do a quick bit of service design or UX work. We tend not to talk about memories. And aren't the creation, and depiction, of memories something advertising can be very good at? (even uniquely suited to?)
Maybe it's time to stop thinking solely about making better experiences. Maybe we need to think a little more about designing for the remembering self. Maybe the role of advertising is, in fact, to make better memories.
(Oh, and I know it's been quiet for over a year here. I guess I'll try and write the next thing sooner.)
He's awesome, right. I played his TED talk to our suits the other day... what's genius about it is that you can fuck something up with a client's experiencing self and then do something awesome to address the problem, and their remembering self doesn't fire you.
Posted by: James Hurman | April 03, 2013 at 06:53 PM
funny you should mention that mate..
http://farisyakob.typepad.com/blog/2013/04/the-story-of-the-memory-of-the-experience.html
Rock ON FX
Posted by: faris | April 03, 2013 at 07:18 PM
Rock on indeed Faris. As usual I'm living in your exhaust fumes:)
Posted by: Gareth | April 04, 2013 at 12:43 AM
Yes, yes, thrice yes. A great and timely course-correction. Thank you.
(The creation, sustaining and enriching of memories that are easily accessed in consumption and purchase occasions is I'd argue, THE primarily contribution of advertising)
Posted by: Martin | April 12, 2013 at 10:39 AM
Very interesting that you bring this up. I don't know if I ever looked at advertising in that way. I think that it is one of the main faults of us in the industry to never give ourselves the credit to think our stuff can last longer than its short run. Maybe it can if we just allow it to.
Posted by: Ryan Wiemer | April 19, 2013 at 03:18 PM
Very timely.
Now don't leave it another year please.
Posted by: northern | April 23, 2013 at 06:00 AM