Birding

twittering....

    follow me on Twitter

    dopplr

    From the Gaping Void

    Food for thought

    « Band as franchise | Main | Are Planners just glorified researchers? »

    November 17, 2009

    Comments

    Andrew

    Great take on an interesting problem. More and more I think people are waking up to the idea that online ads often serve more as a brand awareness tool than anything else but I think it's hard to not want to measure something that can actually be measured.

    Brett T. T. Macfarlane

    I get scared when in response to declining click measure relevance digital media co's start talking about simple reach. Again, they're staying in the digi-sphere. Plus generating dumber stats taking them down a slippery slope.

    On one hand I'm trying to develop multipliers linking online/offline experiences & actions or wondering if I need a math whiz to develop a genius algorithm. Then again, as the financial markets demonstrated, the more sophisticated the math measuring something the less related to reality it is.

    Until someone develops some magic metric interpretation reigns. Then again, even once that metric is developed it too will require interpretation...

    erin

    Here here. Out with the old "metrics" and in with the new, or rather, combine old metrics with new hypotheses in terms of new engagement tactics. I'm more and more convinced that the metrics established to measure effectiveness of advertising as a "display medium" will not work when new marketing tactics have enhanced "advertising" to be a dialogue/conversation. How will we measure engagement? How will we measure conversations? Both online and off. New media require new systems to be evaluated by. what have you found so far to your liking?

    The comments to this entry are closed.


    Age of Conversation

    Traffic by


    Blog powered by Typepad

    All the views


    • expressed on this blog are those of their author alone.

    Battle of The Ad Blogs 2006