Birding

twittering....

    follow me on Twitter

    dopplr

    From the Gaping Void

    Food for thought

    « Perfect Pitch | Main | November book club »

    November 03, 2006

    Comments

    Steve Portigal

    You might be interested, then, in this piece that my friend and colleague Denise Lee Yohn wrote recently...
    http://www.brandchannel.com/brand_speak.asp?bs_id=141

    Jason

    Yeah, good point Gareth. I think that often two objectives get confused.

    User-generated stuff makes a lot of sense if you want to involve people in the brand, give them a sense of co-ownership and community, empower their creativity, or get them thinking of different ways to use the product. All good objectives. But that shouln't be confused with making great, strategic, meaningful, brand-building communications. People are a lot less likely to be able to get you there. It's not that people can't be creative - they clearly can - but we shouldn't expect them to be brand stewards.

    I think your joke analogy is a good one: listener-generated jokes will make people feel listened to, but they won't necessarily be funny.

    Emily

    Yes, I totally agree. Communications shouldn't be run unless they are actually funny/meaningful/strategic. But that goes for agency-generated stuff too!

    brad

    interesting thoughts for a monday morning.
    for anyone interested in the quirky world of language, a new word is picking up quite a following around the world. 'Starkish', which even has it's own blog, started in little ol' NZ but is quickly spreading throughout the online globe. Take a peek at the blog http://thestarkishdebate.blogspot.com
    weird but cool

    akisystems2600

    Agreed, and not. Without doubt the user-created bandwagon is getting weighed down nowadays by greedy passengers. The lesson we should all be taking is that user co-creation is but one tool amongst many that a brand may use when appropriate. Focus on "when appropriate". But us advertisers rarely show restraint on these things, do we? Thus we've evolved an accelerated state wherein too many are forcing this "hot new trend" onto their activities even when it has nothing to do with anything, and failing to consider where to go next with it. The problem isn't users and their passion to co-create, the problem is abusive advertisers failing to protect customer passion, and assuming it is easily harvested thru hokey and unimaginative "contest sweepstakes".

    Dino

    When you think of how quickly this trend deteriorated from something quite interesting to just another hokey and unimaginative tactic (agree with you there aki), it does make you pause and think.
    That original Masters Apple ad was only two years ago (or less?). Incredible.

    Verify your Comment

    Previewing your Comment

    This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

    Working...
    Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
    Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

    The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

    As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

    Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

    Working...

    Post a comment

    Your Information

    (Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)


    Age of Conversation

    Traffic by


    Blog powered by Typepad

    All the views


    • expressed on this blog are those of their author alone.

    Battle of The Ad Blogs 2006